Discussion in 'Debate' started by virgin, Apr 10, 2016.
This topic is touchy (kinda) and a lot of people debate about it.
So I wanna know your opinion.
I dont think they should, idk why they would want to do that in the first place, wouldnt they feel werid??
touchy. AHAHAHAHHAAHA ITS FUNNY CAUSE THEIR TITS ARE BEING SUCKED.
it doesnt bother me and heck i know some friends who breast feed in public, its absolutely not a problem and shouldnt even be considered one. its nature at work in its finest manner, and if a child is breast fed and is hungry, heck just do it in public. obviously if some people would prefer to cover themselves up its no big deal really. as long as they are comfortable with it (which most women are), then its no problem what so ever.
you realise that most people in the world will be breast fed from birth as its the only way milk is produced for probably, 60% of the world? sadly most of the world cant afford the luxuries of food.
yeah touchy. idk some people get really offended because a woman is trying to feed her child in public. i think it's stupid that people get mad but i just wanted to know, yafeel?
Well depending what shes doing, Not like pull that shit right out and start feeding make it a little more private uno
It's not that big of a deal ngl.. I know for a fact some people get so assy about women breastfeeding in public bc they feel like seeing a nipple is the end of the world....
Some women choose to cover up because either they don't feel comfortable with exposing themselves like that OR because they know the people around them may feel uncomfortable..which is stupid. The point of breastfeeding is to feed their child...so the reasoning behind "Why would they want to do that in the first place" is for...oh, I don't know...for the sake of their child's life? No one should have to feel "werid" for feeding their child...ever.
yes but i think they'd also feel weird if their hungry kid started bawling in public and they needed to stop them
go back to the good old days of 1960s america within black culture "as portrayed by white folk" and just hit the kid.
oh wait white parents did that too.
so your mother didnt breastfeed then i take sai
oh no a nipple run the fuck awayy, who gives a shit seriously its called 'not letting your child starve to death'
ive had a poo day and I was about 0.1 nanoseconds away from handing you an infraction. This is a debate thread so atleast be moderate with the stupid things you tend to post on this forum.
If you can't be respectful, then don't post in this thread. It's possible to be civil and respectful in a debate. This is your only warning. Any posts after this one that violates this will be infracted.
to be fair though if i did have massive "finish all over me" titties i would just whip them out in public.
fuck even if i didnt have a kid id just suck the things myself.
Y'all are taking this a little extreme. No child is gonna die if he gets breastfed once the mother gets home, be it an hour later or more.
Have you ever held a hungry baby? Your. ears. will. bleed. Hell Im one more for breastfeeding if it shuts those damn fleshy viruses up
Let me introduce you to my friend
That doesnt provide food for a hungry screaming baby now does it.
That was a reply to you saying a hungry baby's cry makes your ear bleed.
Hungry babies also get even angrier when the plastic nipple in their pukehole doesnt supply tittymilk
So you're telling me when you're hungry you want a piece of rubber shoved down your throat? Kk.
learn 2 read please, that'd be great. What I said is that you're over exaggerating the situation. No baby will die by starvation if he isn't breastfed the moment he begins crying for food.
--- Double Post Merged, Apr 12, 2016 ---
That stops the baby's crying noise from making your ears bleed, since that's what a baby's cry does to your ears, until the mother is in a more private place (such as home) and can breastfeed the baby in peace
--- Double Post Merged, Apr 12, 2016 ---
Separate names with a comma.